EIC Vince: The following post by CFlo started out as a simple feature for a Volvo 1800 but grew like rust in a 240Z hatch into an entire novel about photography and is now this week's Coffee Brake feature. In addition to having automotive ADD, a racing addiction, and an affliction for finding and writing about all sorts of cheap and cool cars for sale, we here at DT like to occasionally analyze the cheap car market itself and some of the techniques used by the more savvy sellers. When selling a car online to prospective remote buyers, several ingredients are needed to seal the deal: a wealth of information, honesty, candor, a sense of customer service, and great pictures of the car. Today we'll talk about that last one for a bit. Find this 1973 Volvo 1800ES for sale in Portland, OR with bidding near $9k on ebay with reserve not met and 4 days to go.Once again the car is the star of the show in this shot, with the pretty forest background blurred out. Now the lighting is still low but more direct and we can see that this is a '70s bronze hue on a '70s car - not bad, mind you, but less is left to the imagination. The shot above almost looks like a marketing scene for the "active sportsman who needs a stylish car to compliment his rugged good looks" type of ad, etc. etc.
I happen to like the proportions and design of the 1800ES as seen from any angle, really, but the rear 3/4 view is one of the best. Maybe that's why this seller (Speed Sports Inc.) includes so many photos from that vantage point.
Notice how even though all of these shots seem to have been taken in the same general area, both the car and photographer keep moving around to set up a wide variety of poses. Like telling a fashion model to "work it," the photographer keeps this ES interesting by being dynamic. Note also that all of the pictures above were taken from probably at least 20 feet away with a moderate telephoto zoom to make the car fill the frame.
So often we see photos in for sale ads that distort the car's true shape - by standing 3 feet away and zooming the camera out, the result is a bulbous and misproportioned look that doesn't really flatter any vehicle unless the goal is some kind of artistic effect. Straight lines become curved in the middle of the frame and fall away dramatically to either side. By standing back and zooming in, you get a better representation of the true shape of the car, like this seller has done. Just look at all those straight horizontal lines on the rear view of the ES. Well...almost straight anyways since it becomes apparent that the bumper has been tweaked and isn't quite sitting parallel to the ground.
Now the light's getting lower in the foreground but the photographer changed up the composition to put the focal point (the car's face) in the bottom third of the frame. The viewer's eye starts there and is drawn upwards and leftwards by the highlighted sweeping arc of the character line running from the fender through the door, sharply curving upwards to point out the big rear greenhouse and vestigial tail fins. Again, shallow depth of field emphasizes the subject without distracting the mind with too much detail in the background. The car has a setting...a place, but we don't need to know too much about it.
Once the myriad overall shots from a millionty different angles are done, we start to get some closeups showing individual highlights of the car. The fluted glass headlight lens looks beautiful in this shot, because it is (although we aren't told any details about the headlights and they certainly don't look like $10 halogen sealed beams) but also because of the composition, focus, and lighting. Everything else falls away and the bright orb near (but not perfectly at) the center of the shot gets all the attention. The human mind likes asymmetry, so biasing the camera towards one side or the other a bit makes what would otherwise be a boring photo pretty dynamic. It's extremely hard to see in the low lighting, but this 1800ES isn't a solid color; it has a custom two-tone paint job with a lighter shade up top and darker below. The headlight shot reveals this best because the sharp border between the two colors is obvious in that little saddle between the headlight and grille surround.
For some reason the seller also includes studio shots under harsh lighting with a black background and because of this change of setting we can see the stark reality. The seats are pretty hideous, naugahyde was never classy, and the carpet is some sickly shade of guacamole puke that doesn't match anything at all. Granted this car looks like a nice driver condition ES that should bring lots of smiles to the enthusiast on a $10k budget, but the full interior spec was best left to the imagination.
The high contrast studio lighting does make the mechanical parts look fantastic; this B20 engine almost seems like a hyperdetailed scale model of itself. The other nice thing about high contrast is that condition is clear - this is a clean powerplant and it has either been well maintained or recently spiffed up for the shoot. Regardless it's a huge improvement over the underexposed, in the shade with vaseline on the lens engine shots that a craigslist seller typically includes, if you're lucky.
Ok, the undercarriage of a 40 year old car (like an 80 year old human) isn't sexy or glamorous at all, but kudos to this seller for putting the car up on a lift and hiking up its skirt so we can conduct a thorough exam. I'm personally about 100x more likely to buy a car sight unseen if I can verify through photos like this that the oily bits aren't too oily and the floors haven't completely turned into iron oxide powder. Sometimes photos don't have to make the car look better than it is - the important part of making a buyer feel comfortable is showing the true condition so they can make their own assessment rather than taking the seller's word for it.
Ah, back to magic hour in the Pacific Northwest. Do you want this car yet or not? Think you'd want it as much if the photos were taken in the dusty garage where the seller probably found it?
See a more worthy recipient of our Ansel Adams badge? Hey - that reminds me - we need a new Ansel Adams badge! email us here: tips@dailyturismo.com












"Anyways" is not a word.
ReplyDeleteShirley, you must be joking?
DeleteIt's "anyway". There's no 's'. Use your spell and grammar checker. Thanks.
DeleteLighten up, Francis.
DeleteIt's called a writer's voice or writing style. Sometimes it's OK to use colloquialisms and informal language. I'm not writing a patent or technical journal here! We try to keep things casual at DT. It's ironic that I'm having to type this reply because I'm usually the grammar Nazi around here, editing everyone else's posts. But diction (aka word choice) is a matter of personal style. Who's to say if I'm right or wrong for choosing one particular form of a word over another?
DeleteAnyways, it's in the dictionary. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/anyways
Insert GIF of The Rock giving an incredulous standing ovation here.
Deletehttp://cdn.niketalk.com/4/48/900x900px-LL-48cb9642_the_rock_clap_clap_gif.gif
DeleteRene, thanks for actually commenting on the post! I hope it's clear to everyone (except Mr. Grr apparently) that I'd never mock or bully a commenter. Simply defending my choice of words.
DeleteDid you find the Grammar Police pic through a google search or something? Quite odd, since we here at DT are good friends with the mastermind behind Evil Engineering...
Is anywho more better?
ReplyDeleteTo mock someone for trying to hold the conversation to a higher standard is not just idiocy, it is typical of the puerile and bullying behavior one finds all over the internet. The moderators do a poor job of handling this - even worse than that other site. I haven't been back to that one in over a year, and this is my last visit here.
ReplyDeleteWe are just having some fun and you need to join in with the laughs.
DeleteLife is to short, I mean too short.
You must admit that the writing style, wit, and presentation is above and beyond any other daily automotive blog. Even Andy Rooney would have approved.
Yeesh, "anyways" is clearly accepted dialect or informal usage. Comes right up on a Google, too many sources to bother listing.
DeleteTake it from this bitter, crusty, "get off my lawn", old pedant: always do a tiny bit of homework on these kinds of things, say your peace if you must, then get on with the wrestling match.
If you're interested enough in the subject matter to come here at all, toughen up and jump in. The number one rule of DT is: whatevers.
There was once a group of chefs who opened a restaurant offering free food to all takers. Some people ate and departed, others left compliments/suggestions and many became regulars. One day a guest called for the head chef and informed him that the eggplant parmesan he was eating was made incorrectly. He said the panko bread crumbs were incorrect and that it should have been made of standard bread crumbs instead of the Japanese style crumbs. No word on if he liked the dish or the rest of the dinner, just the complaint. Cflo informed the patron that substituting panko for standard bread crumbs might not be traditional, but it is common and tastes good. Other patrons seated at the table are somewhat critical of the panko critic, perhaps a bit juvenile, but no food is thrown. The critic now has several choices, one of which is to continue eating the free food and perhaps send a compliment/concern/question to the kitchen every once in a while, an other is to storm home and vow to never return. The choice is his, it is a free country.
Delete